Banner by Myana Lim

RFK Jr.’s Food Fight 

by Thaanvi Malgireddy

In August 2025, RFK Jr. proposed the incorporation of mandatory nutrition modules in every medical school, along with the addition of its contents to the Board Certification Exams that all physicians must take. His reasoning behind this mandate is to empower doctors and provide them with the tools to discuss and create diet plans for their patients confidently.  

In his campaign speech, RFK Jr.’s “food is medicine” approach emphasized that “doctors should be as comfortable talking about fiber and fermentation as they are about insulin and inflammation”. In general, the discussion of lifestyle-based intervention and prevention in medicine has increased following the pandemic.  

Current data only further proves that this discussion is imperative. In the US, 70% of adults are overweight or obese, and as a result, have numerous health complications. While prevention is the more effective route to managing obesity, the prescription of lifelong medications appears to be the more common route accepted by both patients and physicians.   

While many professionals agree that this mandate is imperative to medical education, there has been extreme pushback from professionals on social media. Dr. David Eisenberg of the Harvard School of Public Health agrees with the former. In an interview with ABC, he stated, “I think the public imagines that physicians are required to know a lot more than they are trained to know about nutrition and giving practical advice about food to patients.” He has been a longtime advocate for expanding nutrition education in medical schools to help doctors advise their patients on dietary choices—choices that can ultimately help them lower chronic disease risk. The two opposing perspectives of this debate outline a bigger issue in the American Healthcare System: the constant battle between prevention and pharmacology. Pathology and pharmacology are far more dominant in medical school curriculum, raising the question of what is the perfect recipe for integrating nutrition into that mix.  

 There is an overwhelming amount of evidence that links diet to chronic illness; however, the U.S. medical school curriculum does not emphasize its importance. According to the Journal of Medical Education, the average medical student in the United States receives approximately 19 hours of nutrition instruction in total over their four years of schooling.  

The response from current healthcare providers has been quite polarizing. While some are thrilled about this potential implementation for future doctors, others are skeptical about its necessity. On the other hand, a post about the new mandate from Dr. Zachary Rubin received extremely unfavorable comments from healthcare providers from around the country. Some of the comments that capture the overall dislike for this mandate relate to nutritionist specialization, claiming that “RD here. Please use us. We are the experts.” Those critical of the proposal caution against overextending medical students who already have schedules packed with pathology, pharmacology, and clinical hours. Other comments say that physicians implement nutrition into their treatment plan, and “ya know what insurance pays for? Medication. Ya know what insurance doesn’t pay for? Produce, health foods (or any foods at all), transportation to get to grocery stores, refrigerators/etc to store that food, reliable housing or most resources to help our homeless population.” The latter criticism is rooted in the proposal being attached to a political figure like Kennedy, turning scientific reform into a larger political ideology debate.  

Although the medical community is divided in regards to whether nutrition is being used as an empowering tool or as a dilution of specialization in medical education, everyone unanimously agrees that the debate can no longer be ignored. The current generation of medical students is significantly more open to holistic and preventative care than any previous generation due to the emphasis on mental health and nutrition in their education from a young age.  

 The “food fight” occurring between healthcare providers over RFK Jr.’s proposal sheds light on the American healthcare industry as a whole. Doctors are faced with finding the balance between educating and treating patients in an industry that promotes treatment over education and specialization over holistic medicine.   

The proponents of nutrition reform highlight how prevention aligns with the current public health model and how diet can reduce the onset of chronic disease in the US. Meanwhile, the concerns of skeptics are based on the industrialization of American healthcare: blending professional healthcare specialties and discrimination of a patient’s socioeconomic status.  

 Although the degree of emphasis on nutrition in healthcare has been an ongoing debate, RFK Jr.’s proposal reintroduces it to the limelight and emphasizes the importance of preventative medicine.  

Regardless of the uncertainty of RFK Jr.’s mandate passing, the conversation brought to the table by this proposal is a step in the right direction. The discussions and debates between healthcare professionals regarding this mandate are influencing how they view medicine as a whole. Nutrition should no longer be considered an optional side dish— it is an integral portion of the entree.